Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Hunter or Hunted
In my opinion being the hunter would be easier then being hunted. I would probably choose to be the hunter because when you think about the story the general had several chances to kill Rainsford. The first day that the general hunts Rainsford he finds him in the tree. I would have taken the opportunity because who knows if you’d get another one. General Zarcoff also passes up the chance to kill Rainsford near the swamp. As for my qualifications I am probably not a very good hunter. Although, if I knew the outcome of the game would be the same one as in the story I would reconsider and choose being the hunted.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
True being the hunter would be the easiest option but there are some burdens to it. If you were the hunter you would have to deal with killing someone which i dont think a lot of people can handle.
ReplyDeleteYou have a good point being the hunter it is the easyist but at the same time it is the most dangeres.Reason being that you are normaly in the area of prey or the hunted.Normaly they now there surrondings very well and can use that against you as you hunt them. They might beable to lure you in a trap and at that point you are doomed.
ReplyDelete